Logo of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt

Mathematical Modelling and Data Analysis

Department 8.4

Publication single view


Title: Scrutinizing XAI using linear ground-truth data with suppressor variables
Author(s): R. Wilming, C. Budding, K.-R. Müller and S. Haufe
Journal: Machine Learning
Year: 2022
Volume: 111
Issue: 5
Pages: 1903--1923
DOI: 10.1007/s10994-022-06167-y
ISSN: 0885-6125, 1573-0565
Web URL: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10994-022-06167-y
Tags: 8.4, 8.44
Abstract: Abstract Machine learning (ML) is increasingly often used to inform high-stakes decisions. As complex ML models (e.g., deep neural networks) are often considered black boxes, a wealth of procedures has been developed to shed light on their inner workings and the ways in which their predictions come about, defining the field of ‘explainable AI’ (XAI). Saliency methods rank input features according to some measure of ‘importance’. Such methods are difficult to validate since a formal definition of feature importance is, thus far, lacking. It has been demonstrated that some saliency methods can highlight features that have no statistical association with the prediction target (suppressor variables). To avoid misinterpretations due to such behavior, we propose the actual presence of such an association as a necessary condition and objective preliminary definition for feature importance. We carefully crafted a ground-truth dataset in which all statistical dependencies are well-defined and linear, serving as a benchmark to study the problem of suppressor variables. We evaluate common explanation methods including LRP, DTD, PatternNet, PatternAttribution, LIME, Anchors, SHAP, and permutation-based methods with respect to our objective definition. We show that most of these methods are unable to distinguish important features from suppressors in this setting.

Back to the list view