Logo of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt

Measurement uncertainty

Working Group 8.42
To top

Overview

Comparison of measurement results, reliable decision-making and conformity assessment require the evaluation of uncertainties associated with measurement results. The ability to compare measurements made in different places and at different times underpins international metrology. The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (Opens external link in new windowGUM) provides guidance for the evaluation of uncertainties, and it has been applied successfully in many applications throughout metrology.

 

Illustration of Monte Carlo method according to Opens external link in new windowSupplement 1 to the GUM.

In recent years metrology has expanded to support new fields to address societal challenges relating to energy and sustainability, climate and environmental monitoring, life sciences and health, using measurement modalities such as imaging, spectroscopy, earth observation and sensor networks. Reliable uncertainty evaluation is particularly important in these applications, e.g. to safeguard the diagnosis of a tumor in quantitative imaging or to reliably monitor air pollution. The GUM does not adequately address the challenges arising in these applications, and the development of statistical procedures for improved uncertainty evaluation is an urgent need.

To top

Research

The focus of PTB’s Working Group 8.42 is on the development of Bayesian methods for the evaluation of uncertainties. The development is carried out within the context of different research areas of data analysis such as large-scale data analysis or deep learning. Bayesian inference procedures suitable for the extension of the current GUM methodology are also part of the current research in PTB’s Working Group 8.42. Examples include simple means to assign distributions representing the available prior knowledge, or procedures for the numerical calculation of results. Open source software support is provided to ease the application of the research results.

To top

Software

To top

Publications

Publication single view

Contribution to book

Title: Uncertainty evaluation for traceable dynamic measurement of mechanical quantities: A case study in dynamic pressure calibration
Author(s): T. J. Esward, C. Matthews, S. Downes, A. Knott, S. Eichstädt and C. Elster
Editor: F. Pavese, M. Bär, J.-R. Filtz, A. B. Forbes, L. Pendrill, K. Shirono
Year: 2012
Volume: Advanced Mathematical & Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing IX  
Series: Series on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences
Edition: 84
Chapter: 19
Pages: 143-151
World Scientific New Jersey
Keywords: dynamic pressure, calibration, dynamic measurement
Tags: 8.42, Dynamik, Unsicherheit

Back to the list view

To top