zum Seiteninhalt

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt

StructureDiv. 1 Mechanics and Acoustics1.5 Liquid Flow > 1.53 Traceability in Liquid Flow Measurement
Traceability in Liquid Flow Measurement
Working group 1.53



Tasks

The Working Group "Traceability of Liquid Flow Measurement" deals with all fundamental topics in the field of liquid volume and liquid flow measurement. This includes the fundamental and conceptional questions as to how to realise the corresponding units and how to disseminate them, as well as the global issue of the appurtenant considerations with regard to measurement uncertainties. The task area of this working group can be summarised by the definition "ensuring that all liquid flow measurements are traceable to the national standard".

Specific characteristics for realisation and dissemination in the field of liquid flow measurement

It is in general true that, for ensuring uniform and correct measuring, the measurement must be traced back to a national or international standard for the corresponding measurand. This means that the reading of the measuring instrument used can be compared with the primary standard which stands at the top of the corresponding calibration hierarchy in an uninterrupted chain of successive comparisons.

In the field of liquid flow measurements, PTB has a series of standard measuring facilities at its disposal whose core is the hydrodynamic test field (HTF). The following characteristics, which are specific to the field of volume and flow measurement of liquids, have to be pointed out:

  • In total, four measurands occur – volume, mass, volume flowrate and mass flowrate – whereby both volume-flow- and mass-flow-related measurands, within the traceability process, may be converted into one another by incorporating the measurand "density".
  • Before the HTF was commissioned for liquid flow measurands in 2003, there was no uninterrupted chain of traceability to a national standard available. Each measuring facility used for testing and calibration was traced back to the required standards of mass, length, density, temperature and time, element by element, according to its active principle of measurement (volumetric or gravimetric). In such a case, the measured value which is defined to be the stimulating reference input to the meter under test is "statically" composed of the corresponding above-mentioned individual measurands. Since such a traceability is not based upon the measurand to be determined, influences on the measurement result which originate from the dynamics of the measuring process are not suitably taken into account. Among these are, for example, disturbed velocity profiles or high degrees of turbulence of the flow at the place of installation of the meter under test, fluctuating fluid flows during the measurements, instable operation of flow control devices, effects due to pump vibrations, to mention only some.
  • All methods which have been known up to now and on which liquid flow measurements are based display, besides the fact that they can be dynamically influenced, also a - sometimes very strong - dependence on the material parameters of the liquid to be measured. It is therefore mandatory to test or calibrate each measuring instrument solely with the fluid it is dedicated to.  This means that, for each metrologically relevant liquid, it would be necessary to establish a specific traceability chain, which, for economic as well as for metrological reasons, does not make sense.

 

Establishing a uniform system for the traceability of all liquid flow measurements to the national standard – the Hydrodynamic Test Field (HTF)

PTB has therefore elaborated an alternative, long-term concept. The plan is that all liquid measurements can be traced back to one single national standard – the HTF – by means of medium-independent transfer standards and methods which still have to be developed. In this way, the measurands which can be realised with the HTF with the fluid "water" can be disseminated to all subordinate testing and calibration facilities by means of such transfer standards – independent of the liquid to be measured with which these facilities work. Figure 1 shows this concept.

Figure 1:  Long-term concept to create a single, closed system of traceability of all liquid flow measurements to the Hydrodynamic Test Field

The Hydrodynamic Test Field (HTF)

The hydrodynamic test field realises all four measurands which are relevant for the total flow and flowrate measurement of liquids: mass, volume, mass flowrate and volume flowrate of a streaming liquid. It is operated with the fluid "water" in a flowrate range from 0.3 m3/h to 2100 m3/h and with an expanded relative measurement uncertainty of 0.02 %.

The core component of the HTF is a gravimetric reference standard which consists of three weighing systems with a 30-ton, a 3-ton and a 300-kilogram balance. The mass which is determined in this way – if necessary using the density of the fluid to be measured, as well as the measuring time – is compared with the readings of the meter under test. The following photograph shows a part of the measuring hall in which the HTF is located. In the foreground, the two measuring sections are to be seen, each of which can be operated alternatively and in which flowmeters can be mounted with nominal diameters between 20 mm and 400 mm. In the background, one can see two of the three weighing systems – the 30-ton balance and the 3-ton balance.

The HTF's three weighing systems basically work according to the same operating principle: they combine a "classic" lever scale with an electromagnetic force-compensating load cell and strain-gauge force transducers as sensor elements. In addition, each weighing system is equipped with an integrated calibration facility. In order to isolate them from dynamic disturbances, the weighing systems were set up on a vibration-isolated concrete foundation.

Flow is generated and stabilised by a system of electronically regulated pumps and a constant-head tank with an overflow weir. The constant-head tank has a capacity of 6 m3, is located 35 m above ground level and serves, in addition, as a high-precision flow stabiliser.

The measuring and operating mode in which the highest calibration accuracy is achieved – and which is utilised at PTB's measuring facility – is static weighing with flying-start-and-finish operation. In this operation mode, the test liquid is kept in a constant circulating motion through the system's pipework prior to and during a calibration run. The actual measuring operation is started by switching the diverter's diverting edge from the bypass position into the diverting position in which the liquid flow is directed towards the weighing tank. When passing the centre of the diverter's liquid jet, a gate signal is initiated that launches data acquisition from the test meter's signal output and starts an electronic counter which determines the diversion time. Upon reaching a pre-defined quantity of water in the weighing tank, the diverter is switched back into its initial position. And when passing the jet's centre again, the signal acquisition of the test meter and the time measurement are stopped.

From the very beginning, all components of the test field were designed and built in such a way that their individual uncertainty components realise pre-defined projected values which, in turn, ensure for the total expanded measurement uncertainty of the facility a value which is better than the above-mentioned value of 0.02 %. When a flowmeter with a pulse frequency signal output f (e.g. a turbine meter, an electromagnetic or Coriolis flowmeter) is calibrated, the equations for the determination of the standard measurement uncertainty of the meter K-factor Kmeter have the following form:

where uK_meter     is the standard measurement uncertainty of the measuring instrument's K-factor:

uf              is the standard measurement uncertainty of the measurement of the pulse signal frequency f

um            is the standard measurement uncertainty of the determination of the mass m of the liquid to be measured

uρ             is the standard measurement uncertainty of the determination of the density ρ of the test liquid

uΔV           is the standard measurement uncertainty of the determination of the connecting pipe's volume

ΔV            (pipe section between the meter under test and the standard device)

uT_div       is the standard measurement uncertainty of the diverter's time error

uT             is the standard measurement uncertainty of the determination of the measuring time TMEAS

 

 

On the basis of this decisive criterion for the design of this water flow facility, all constructive, functional and uncertainty-determining metrological requirements have been correspondingly derived.

Furthermore, for the function of the entire flow standard facility, the optimal functional integration of all individual components into the overall system of the measuring installation is an indispensable precondition. This was realised by correspondingly designing the process control system of the entire facility. For the weighing system, e.g., this means that also the measurement values of ambient temperature, atmospheric pressure and relative humidity required for the correction of the air buoyancy are acquired and made available to the supervising process control system for further processing of the measurement analysing and processing of the measurement data. Furthermore, the balance calibrations, which are performed each time a high-precision flow calibration is carried out, also provide data for the purposes of a qualified quality management. Thus, it can be continuously checked whether the limit values stated as well as their long-term stability are complied with. On the basis of the regularly recorded data and their permanent surveillance, it is possible to detect deviations from the "normal" functionality in due time and to take, if necessary, maintenance or repair measures. Only this can reliably and credibly guarantee the measurement uncertainty of the hydrodynamic test field for each of the measurements performed.

It should be especially pointed out that also internationally, the high metrological level of the HTF is highly acknowledged and was clearly proved by the BIPM key comparison which was completed in 2006.

Figure 1: Setup of the Hydrodynamic Test Field (without building)

To guarantee the low uncertainty of measurement, two standard measuring facilities were installed in the test field - one of them (weighing systems with diverters) working on the gravimetric principle and the other one (pipe prover) on the volumetric principle (see Figure 1) /1/. A direct (internal) comparison of measurements between the two measuring facilities will allow to detect and determine in concrete values the effects which influence quantities exert on the uncertainty of measurement, which could hardly be realistically assessed up to now /2/

Technical data and calibration capabilities:

 Measurands:  Volumetric flow rate
 Mass flow rate
 Volume (totalized)
 Mass (totalized)
 Flow-rate meters
and
Volume and mass flow totalizing meters
 Calibration modes:
 a) flying START & FINISH
 b) standing START & FINISH
 Operation control via:
Diverter
ON/OFF valve
 Reference standards:  Gravimetric calibration
 

 Volumetric calibration

 Balances: 30 t 
 3 t 
 0.3 t 
 Pipe prover
(reference volume: 250 l,
1.6 ... 1600 m³/h) 
 Operation modes:  Via constant-head tank
 

 Pump direct operation

 Constant pressure in calibration line
(approx. 0.35 MPa)
Variable pressure in calibration line
(max. approx. 0.6 MPa)
 Meter / pipe sizes: Calibration line A
Calibration line B
DN 200 ... DN 400
DN 20 ... DN 150
 Ranges of flow rate: Calibration line A
Calibration line B
 3 m³/h ... 2100 m³/h
0.3 m³/h ... 320 m³/h
 Pressure range: 0.2 MPa ... 0.6 MPa  (pump direct operation)
 Adjustable temperature range: 20 °C ... 23 °C (via constant-head tank)
 Expanded measurement uncertainty: ± 0.02 % (via constant-head tank)
 Further plant items: Storage tank
Constant-head tank
380 m³ capacity
35 m³ capacity,
overflow weir at a height of approx. 35 m

To top




Publications on the "Hydrodynamic Test field"

/1/  W. Pöschel,
R. Engel
 The concept of a new primary standard for liquid flow measurement at PTB Braunschweig  The 9th International Conference on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO '98, proceedings, pp. 7-12, Lund, Sweden, June 15-17, 1998
/2/  W. Pöschel  Internal and External Measurement for Ensuring Accuracy and Traceability in Flowmeter Calibration  4th International Symposium on Fluid Flow Measurement , Denver, CO, USA, June 27-30, 1999
/3/  W. Pöschel,
R. Engel,
D. Dopheide,
H.J. Baade,
H.J. Kecke,
R. Praetor,
N. Weist,
E. Kurras
 A unique fluid diverter design for water flow calibration facilities  The 10th International Conference on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO 2000, Salvador, Brazil, June 5-8, 2000 
/4/  R. Engel,
U. Klages
  A novel approach to improve diverter performance in liquid flow calibration facilities  The 10th International Conference on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO 2000, Salvador, Brazil, June 5-8, 2000 
/5/  R. Engel  Das Hydrodynamische Prüffeld der PTB zur Untersuchung von Durchflussmessgeräten (PTB's Hydrodynamic Test Field - a facility to investigate liquid flowmeters)  PTB seminar: New developments in calibrating liquid flowmeters, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, 13.-14.11.2001 
(seminar program)
/6/  H. Többen  Kalibrierung einer Rohrprüfstrecke nach unterschiedlichen Verfahren (Calibration of a pipe prover by applying different methods)  PTB seminar: New developments in calibrating liquid flowmeters, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, 13.-14.11.2001 
(seminar program)
/7/  W. Pöschel  Die Aufgaben eines Primärnormals zur Sicherung der Vergleichbarkeit der Kalibrierergebnisse in der Durchflussmesstechnik (Tasks of a primary standard to guarantee comparability of calibration results in flow metering)  PTB seminar: New developments in calibrating liquid flowmeters, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, 13.-14.11.2001 
(seminar program)
/8/  R. Engel  Dynamic Weighing - Improvements in Gravimetric Liquid Flowmeter Calibration  5th International Symposium on Fluid Flow Measurement , Arlington, VA, USA, April 8-10, 2002 
/9/  R. Engel,
H.-J. Baade,
A. Rubel
 Performance Improvement of Liquid Flow Calibrators by Applying Special Measurement and Control Strategies  The 11th International Conference on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO 2003, Groningen, The Netherlands, May 12-14, 2003 
/10/  R. Engel,
H.-J. Baade
 New-Design Dual-Balance Gravimetric Reference Systems with PTB's New "Hydrodynamic Test Field"  The 11th International Conference on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO 2003, Groningen, The Netherlands, May 12-14, 2003 
/11/  R. Engel   PTB's "Hydrodynamic Test Field" - Investigations to Verify the Measurement Uncertainty Budget  The 12th International Conference on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO 2004, Guilin, China, September 14-17, 2004
/12/  R. Engel,
H.-J. Baade
  Determination of liquid flowmeter characteristics for precision measurement purposes by utilizing special capabilities of PTB's "Hydrodyanmic Test Field"  6th International Symposium on Fluid Flow Measurement , Querétario, Mexico, May 16-18, 2006
/13/  A. Loza Guerrero,
R. Engel
  Water flow comparison measurements between Centro Nacional de Metrología (Mexico) and Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Germany) by using a CENAM 100-mm dual-turbine meter transfer standard  6th International Symposium on Fluid Flow Measurement , Querétario, Mexico, May 16-18, 2006
/14/  J.S. Paik, K.B. Lee, R. Engel, A. Loza, Y. Terao, M. Reader-Harris  BIPM  Key Comparison KC1, Final Report: CCM.FF-K1 for Water Flow  BIPM Bureau International des Poids et  Measures, Paris, - Key and supplementary comparisons: Calibration and Measurement Capabilities Mass and related quantities, Nov. 2006
/15/ R. Engel  Modeling the uncertainty in liquid flowmeter calibration and application - Requirements and their technical realization for PTB's national water flow standard  13th SENSOR Congress 2007, Nürnberg, Germany, May 22-24, 2007
/16/  R. Engel, H.-J. Baade  Model-based fluid diverter analysis for improved uncertainty determination in liquid flow calibration facilities, exemplified with PTB's "Hydrodynamic Test Field"  The 14th International Conference on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO 2007, Johannesburg, South Africa, September 18-21, 2007
/17/  J. Aguilera, R. Engel, G. Wendt  Dynamic-weighing liquid flow calibration system - Realization of a model-based concept  The 14th International Conference on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO 2007, Johannesburg, South Africa, September 18-21, 2007
/18/ R. Engel  Wägetechnische Aspekte in der Durchflussmessung (Aspects of weighing in fluid flow measurement)
sensor report, 4-2008,  S. 26 - 30
/19/  R. Engel, B. Mickan
 Aspects of traceability and comparisons in flow measurement  7th International Symposium on Fluid Flow Measurement , Anchorage, USA, August 12-14, 2009
/20/  R. Engel, H.-J. Baade  Model-based flow diverter analysis for an improved uncertainty determination in liquid flow calibration facilities  Measurement Science and Technology 21 (2010) 025401 (11pp)
/21/  W. Pöschel,
R. Engel
 Das Hydrodynamische Prüffeld - Funktionsprinzipien, Aufbau und Funktionsbeschreibung (The Hydrodynamic Test Field - Functional principles, setup, and function description)  Unpublished research report, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, 1998
/22/  H.J. Kecke,
R. Praetor
 Abschlußbericht zur Gestaltung, Bemessung, Bestückung, Herstellung und zum Test der Umschaltapparatur für die Mess-Strecke DN 150 - Teil: Gestaltung, Bemessung sowie strömungsseitige Untersuchung und Test (Prototyp-Entwicklung) (Final report on the layout, dimensional design, equipment, construction, and verification tests of the DN 150 diverting device)  Research report, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany, Institute for Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, December 1999
/23/  H.J. Kecke,
R. Praetor
 Abschlußbericht zur Gestaltung, Bemessung, Bestückung, Herstellung und zum Test der Umschaltapparatur für die Mess-Strecke DN 400 - Teil: Gestaltung, Bemessung (Final report on the layout, dimensional design, equipment, construction, and verification tests of the DN 400 diverting device)  Research report, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany, Institute for Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, July 2000
/24/  H.J. Kecke,
R. Praetor
 Abschlußbericht Gestaltung, Bemessung, Bestückung und Herstellung der Umschaltapparatur für die Mess-Strecke DN 50 - Teil: Gestaltung, Bemessung (Final report on the layout, dimensional design, equipment, construction, and verification tests of the DN 50 diverting device)  Research report, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany, Institute for Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, May 2001
/25/ A. Kliewe  Reglerentwurf für die Temperaturregelung des Wassers im Hydrodynamischen Prüffeld der Physikalisch-Technischen Bundesanstalt Braunschweig per Simulationsmodell mit MATLAB und SIMULINK (Controller design of the water temperature control installation in PTB's Hydrodynamic Test Field utilizing MATLAB/SIMULINK dynamic system simulation)  Diploma thesis, University of Applied Sciences Hannover, Electrical Engineering Department, Control Engineering Section, November 2000

Books on "fluid flow measurement"

Author(s) Titel Publisher Town(s) Year
Merzkirch, W.
(Editor)
Fluid Mechanics of Flow Metering Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 2005
Baker, R. C. FLOW MEASUREMENT HANDBOOK - Industrial designs, operating principles, performance, and applications Cambridge University Press  Cambridge, United Kingdom  2000 
Adunka, F. Meßunsicherheiten - Theorie und Praxis, 3. Auflage  Vulkan-Verlag  Essen  2007 
Adunka, F. Handbuch der Wärmeverbrauchsmessung - Grundlagen, Methoden, Probleme, 3. Auflage  Vulkan-Verlag  Essen  1999 
Goldstein, R. J. Fluid Mechanics Measurement  Taylor & Francis  Philadelphia, PA 1996 
Miller, R. W. Flow Measurement Engineering Handbook, 3rd Edition McGraw-Hill  New York, San Francisco 1996 
Stuck, D.
(Editor) 
Meßanlagen für Volumenmeßteile von Wärmezählern - derzeitiger Stand und zukünftige Entwicklungen, PTB-Bericht PTB-W-61 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt  Berlin und Braunschweig  1995 
Witt, A. Realisierungsmöglichkeiten von Meßanlagen für Volumenmeßteile von Wärmezählern der Klasse 1 (gemäß CEN-Norm EN 1434 "Wärmezähler"), Beitrag aus PTB-Bericht PTB-W-61 (see above) Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt  Berlin und Braunschweig  1995 
Lipták, B.
(Editor)
Flow Measurement  Chilton Book Company Radnor, PA 1993
Upp, E. L. Fluid Flow Measurement - A practical guide to accurate flow measurement  Gulf Publishing Company  Houston, London, Paris, Zürich  1993 
Fiedler, O. Strömungs- und Durchflußmeßtechnik  R. Oldenburg Verlag  München, Wien 1992 
Spitzer, D. W.
(Editor)
Flow Measurement - Practical Guides for Measurement and Control Instrument Society of America Research Triangle Park, NC 1991
Furness, R. A.. Fluid Flow Measurement Longman House Harlow, United Kingdom 1990
DeCarlo, J. P. Fundamentals of Flow Measurement Instrument Society of America Research Triangle Park, NC 1984
Spitzer, D. W. Industrial Flow Measurement  Instrument Society of America Research Triangle Park, NC  1984
Cheremisinoff, N. P. Applied Fluid Flow Measurement - Fundamentals and Technology  Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, Basel  1979
Hayward, A. T. J. Flowmeters - A basic guide and source-book for users The MacMillan Press Ltd. London, Basingstoke 1979
Bonfig, K.W. Technische Durchflußmessung Vulcan Verlag  Essen 1977
Zejtlin, W.G. Volumen- und Durchflußmeßtechnik Fachbuch Verlag Leipzig  Leipzig 1971 
Orlicek, A. F.; Reuther, F. L. Zur Technik der Mengen- und Durchflussmessung von Flüssigkeiten  R. Oldenbourg Verlag  München, Wien  1971 
Kalkhof, H.-G. Mengenmessung von Flüssigkeiten Carl Hanser Verlag München 1964

To top




Contact

Dr.-Ing. Rainer Engel
Tel.: 0531-592-1321
E-Mail: rainer.engel@ptb.de

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
Arbeitsgruppe 1.52 - Hydrodynamisches Prüffeld
Bundesallee 100
38116 Braunschweig
Germany

To top


© Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, last update: 2011-10-31, Webmaster FB 1.5 Seite drucken PrintviewPDF-Export PDF